human gp100 25–33 (hgp100) peptide (GenScript corporation)
Structured Review

Human Gp100 25–33 (Hgp100) Peptide, supplied by GenScript corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/human gp100 25–33 (hgp100) peptide/product/GenScript corporation
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "AIM2 regulates anti-tumor immunity and is a viable therapeutic target for melanoma"
Article Title: AIM2 regulates anti-tumor immunity and is a viable therapeutic target for melanoma
Journal: The Journal of Experimental Medicine
doi: 10.1084/jem.20200962
Figure Legend Snippet: Vaccination with AIM2-deficient DC improves the efficacy of ACT through activation of STING–type I IFN signaling. (A) IFN-β or CXCL10 in the supernatants of indicated BMDCs stimulated with 0, 0.1, or 1 µg/ml B16F10 DNA for 4 h (IFN-β) or 10 h (CXCL10; n = 3). (B) Immunoblotting for pTBK1, TBK1, pIRF3, IRF3, and vinculin in the lysates of indicated BMDCs stimulated with 0, 0.1, or 1 µg/ml B16F10 DNA for 4 h. (C–G) B16F10-bearing WT mice (B16F10 mice) were treated with ACT alone or ACT + 1.0 × 10 6 WT, Aim2 −/− , or Aim2 −/− Sting −/− DC-gp100. On day 20 after PMELs (1.0 × 10 6 cells) transfer, tissues were harvested. (C) The therapy regimen scheme. (D) Tumor growth over time (left; n = 9). Sample photo of B16F10 tumor on day 20 after PMELs transfer (right). Scale bar, 10 mm. (E and F) Flow cytometry analysis of TILs ( n = 9). (E) The numbers of PMELs, CD8 + T cells, and CD4 + T cells among 10 4 live singlet cells, percentage of FoxP3 + cells in CD4 + T cells, and PMEL/T reg cell ratio. (F) Percentages of IFN-γ + and TNF-α + cells in PMELs. (G) IFN-β protein levels within the tumor, TdLN, and spleen ( n = 7). (H and I) B16F10 DNA–stimulated WT or Aim2 −/− DC-gp100 was cocultured with CFSE-labeled PMELs for 72 h ( n = 5). (H) Histograms of PMELs CFSE dilution. (I) Proliferation index of PMELs and amount of IFN-γ + in the supernatants. (J and K) B16F10 mice were treated with ACT using 1.0 × 10 6 CFSE-labeled PMELs + 1.0 × 10 6 WT or Aim2 −/− DC-gp100. On day 3 after PMELs transfer, spleens were harvested. (J) The therapeutic regimen. (K) Histograms of PMELs CFSE dilution, proliferation index of PMELs, and numbers of PMELs among 10 4 live singlet cells in the spleen ( n = 6 or 7). Data are shown as mean ± SEM and are pooled from three (A and D–G) or two (I and K) experiments or are representative of at least two independent experiments (B, H, and K). *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001; two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparisons test (D), one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s (A and I) or Tukey’s (E, F, and K) multiple-comparisons test, or Mann–Whitney test (G and I).
Techniques Used: Activation Assay, Western Blot, Flow Cytometry, Labeling, MANN-WHITNEY
Figure Legend Snippet: The effect of AIM2-deficient DC vaccine with ACT on tumor, TdLN, and spleen in the B16F10 model. (A) Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of Ifnb , Ifna , Cxcl10 , and Cxcl9 mRNA expression in indicated BMDCs stimulated with 0, 0.1, or 1 µg/ml B16F10 DNA for 4 h ( n = 3), presented in AU, relative to Actb (encoding β-actin) expression. (B) Experimental scheme for analyzing DC vaccine infiltration in the tumor, TdLN, and spleen. B16F10-bearing CD45.1 congenic B6 mice were treated with ACT using 1.0 × 10 6 PMELs (CD45.2) + 1.0 × 10 6 WT or Aim2 −/− DC-gp100 (CD45.2), and tissues were harvested 1.5 d after PMELs transfer. (C) The absolute numbers of transferred DCs present in the tumor, TdLN, and spleen ( n = 8). (D and E) Flow cytometry analysis of the percentage of FoxP3 − cells in total CD4 + T cells, numbers of MACs, DCs, CD103 + DCs, and CD11b + DCs among 10 4 live singlet cells in the tumor (D), numbers of PMELs, CD8 + T cells, CD4 + T cells among 10 4 live singlet cells, and percentages of FoxP3 + cells in CD4 + T cells in the TdLN and spleen (E) of B16F10 mice treated with ACT + WT, Aim2 −/− , or Aim2 −/− Sting −/− DC-gp100 ( n = 9). (F and G) Flow cytometry staining of CD11b and CD103 (F) and the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of MHC class I (MHC-I), CD86, or CD80 (G) on freshly generated WT and Aim2 −/− BMDCs ( n = 8). Data are shown as mean ± SEM and are pooled from three (A and C–E) or two (G) independent experiments or are representative of two independent experiments (F). *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001; one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s (A) or Tukey’s (D and E) multiple-comparisons test or Mann–Whitney test (C and G). FMO, fluorescence minus one control.
Techniques Used: Quantitative RT-PCR, Expressing, Flow Cytometry, Staining, Fluorescence, Generated, MANN-WHITNEY, Control
Figure Legend Snippet: Enhanced anti-melanoma immunity of vaccination with AIM 2 -deficient DCs is dependent on the recognition of tumor-derived DNA and independent of prolonged cell survival of vaccinated DCs. (A–C) B16F10 mice were treated with ACT + WT or Aim2 −/− DC-gp100 and intratumoral (i.t.) administration of DNase I or PBS. On day 20 after PMEL transfer, tissues were harvested. (A) Therapy regimen scheme. (B) Tumor growth over time (left; n = 9). Sample photo of B16F10 tumor on day 20 after PMELs transfer (right). Scale bar, 10 mm. (C) Flow cytometry analysis of the numbers of PMELs, CD8 + T cells, and CD4 + T cells among 10 4 live singlet cells, percentage of FoxP3 + cells in CD4 + T cells, and PMEL/T reg cell ratio in the tumor ( n = 9). (D) Experimental scheme for analyzing DC vaccine infiltration in the tumor, TdLN, and spleen. B16F10-bearing CD45.1 congenic B6 mice were treated with ACT using 1.0 × 10 6 PMELs (CD45.2) + 1.0 × 10 6 WT or Aim2 −/− DC-gp100 (CD45.2), and tissues were harvested on day 10 ( n = 7) and day 20 ( n = 8) after PMELs transfer. (E) Representative contour plot for CD45.2 + Thy1.1 − CD11c + MHC-II + DC-gp100 (DC vaccine) present at the tumor, TdLN, and spleen on day 20 after PMELs transfer. (F) The absolute number of vaccinated DCs present in the tumor, TdLN, and spleen on days 10 ( n = 7) and 20 ( n = 8) after PMELs transfer. Data are shown as mean ± SEM and are pooled from four (B and C) or three (F) independent experiments or are representative of three independent experiments (E). *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparisons test (B), one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparisons test (C), or Mann–Whitney test (F).
Techniques Used: Derivative Assay, Flow Cytometry, MANN-WHITNEY
Figure Legend Snippet: The role of DNA sensing, IFNAR, and CXCL10 in AIM2-deficient DC vaccine with ACT on tumor, TdLN, and spleen in the B16F10 model. (A and B) Flow cytometry analysis of the numbers of PMELs, CD8 + T cells (A), and CD4 + T cells among 10 4 live singlet cells and percentages of FoxP3 + cells in CD4 + T cells (B) in the TdLN and spleen of B16F10 mice treated with ACT + WT or Aim2 −/− DC-gp100 and intratumoral administration of DNase I or PBS ( n = 9). (C–E) Flow cytometry analysis of the percentage of FoxP3 − cells in total CD4 + T cells, numbers of CD103 + and CD11b + DCs among 10 4 live singlet cells in the tumor (C), numbers of PMELs, CD8 + T cells (D), and CD4 + T cells among 10 4 live singlet cells and percentages of FoxP3 + cells in CD4 + T cells (E) in the TdLN and spleen of B16F10 mice treated with ACT + WT, Aim2 −/− , Aim2 −/− Ifnar −/− , or Aim2 −/− Cxcl10 −/− DC-gp100 ( n = 10 or 11). Data are shown as mean ± SEM and are pooled from four (A and B) or three (C–E) independent experiments. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001; one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparisons test (A–E).
Techniques Used: Flow Cytometry
Figure Legend Snippet: AIM2-deficient DC vaccination facilitates tumor antigen–specific CD8 + T cell infiltration into the tumor via IFNAR signaling and CXCL10 production. (A) IFN-β or CXCL10 in the supernatants of indicated BMDCs stimulated with 0, 0.1, or 1 µg/ml B16F10 DNA for 4 (IFN-β) or 10 h (CXCL10; n = 3). (B–D) B16F10 mice were treated with ACT + WT, Aim2 −/− , Aim2 −/− Ifnar −/− , or Aim2 −/− Cxcl10 −/− DC-gp100. On day 20 after PMELs transfer, tissues were harvested ( n = 10 or 11). (B) Tumor growth over time. (C and D) Flow cytometry analysis of TILs. (C) The numbers of PMELs, CD8 + T cells, and CD4 + T cells among 10 4 live singlet cells, percentages of FoxP3 + cells in CD4 + T cells, and PMEL/T reg cell ratio. (D) The percentages of IFN-γ + and TNF-α + in CD8 + T cells. (E–G) Similar analysis as in B–D was performed on B16F10 mice treated by ACT with WT, Aim2 −/− Cxcl10 −/− , or Cxcl10 −/− DC-gp100 ( n = 8 or 9). Data are shown as mean ± SEM and are pooled from three independent experiments (A–G). *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001; two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparisons test (B and E) or one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s (A) or Tukey’s (C, D, and F) multiple-comparisons test.
Techniques Used: Flow Cytometry
Figure Legend Snippet: Reduced IL-1β and IL-18 production by AIM2-deficient DC vaccination restricts T reg cell infiltration into the tumor. (A) IL-1β, IL-18, IFN-β, and CXCL10 in the supernatants of indicated BMDCs stimulated with 0, 0.1, or 1 µg/ml B16F10 DNA for 4 (IFN-β) or 10 h (IL-1β, IL-18, and CXCL10; n = 3). (B–E) B16F10 mice were treated with ACT + WT, Aim2 −/− , or Il1β −/− DC-gp100. On day 20 after PMELs transfer, tissues were harvested ( n = 12–14). (B) Tumor growth over time. (C–E) Flow cytometry analysis of TILs. The numbers of PMELs, CD8 + T cells (C), and CD4 + T cells among 10 4 live singlet cells, percentage of FoxP3 + cells in CD4 + T cells, PMEL/T reg ratio (D), and the percentages of IFN-γ + and TNF-α + (E) in CD8 + T cells. (F–I) B16F10 mice were treated with ACT + WT, Aim2 −/− , or Il18 −/− DC-gp100. On day 20 after PMELs transfer, tissues were harvested ( n = 8 or 9), and similar analysis as in B–E was performed. Data are shown as mean ± SEM and are pooled from three independent experiments (A–I). *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001; two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparisons test (B and F) or one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s (A) or Tukey’s (C–E and G–I) multiple-comparisons test.
Techniques Used: Flow Cytometry
Figure Legend Snippet: Effect of IL-1β– and IL-18–deficient DC vaccine, as well as Aim2 siRNA–transfected WT DC vaccine with ACT on tumor, TdLN, and spleen in the B16F10 model. (A–C) Flow cytometry analysis of the percentage of FoxP3 − cells in total CD4 + T cells, numbers of CD103 + and CD11b + DCs among 10 4 live singlet cells in the tumor (A), numbers of PMELs, CD8 + T cells (B), and CD4 + T cells among 10 4 live singlet cells, and percentages of FoxP3 + cells in CD4 + T cells (C) in the TdLN and spleen of B16F10 mice treated with ACT + WT, Aim2 −/− , or Il1β −/− DC-gp100 ( n = 12–14). (D–F) Similar analysis as in A–C was performed on B16F10 mice treated with ACT + WT, Aim2 −/− , or Il-18 −/− DC-gp100 ( n = 9). (G) Flow cytometry analysis of the numbers of PMELs, CD8 + T cells, and CD4 + T cells among 10 4 live singlet cells and percentages of FoxP3 + cells in CD4 + T cells in the TdLN and spleen of B16F10 mice treated with ACT with control- or Aim2 siRNA–transfected DC-gp100 ( n = 9). Data are shown as mean ±SEM and are pooled from three (A–F) or two (G) independent experiments. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s (A–F) or Dunnett’s (G) multiple-comparisons test.
Techniques Used: Transfection, Flow Cytometry, Control
Figure Legend Snippet: AIM2-silenced DC vaccine improves the efficacy of ACT against melanoma. (A) Immunoblotting for AIM2 and vinculin in the lysates of mock-, control siRNA–, or Aim2 siRNA– (-1 or -2) transfected WT BMDCs 48 h after transfection. (B) Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of the Aim2 mRNA expression in mock-, control siRNA–, or Aim2 siRNA–transfected WT BMDCs 2, 10, and 22 d after transfection ( n = 6). (C–E) B16F10 mice were treated with ACT + control siRNA– or Aim2 siRNA–transfected WT DC-gp100. On day 20 after PMELs transfer, tissues were harvested. (C) Therapy regimen scheme. (D) Tumor growth over time (left; n = 9). Sample photo of B16F10 tumor on day 20 after PMELs transfer (right). Scale bar, 10 mm. (E) Flow cytometry analysis of the numbers of PMELs, CD8 + , and CD4 + T cells among 10 4 live singlet cells, percentage of FoxP3 + cells in CD4 + T cells, and PMEL/T reg cell ratio in the tumor ( n = 9). Data are shown as mean ± SEM and are representative of three independent experiments (A) or are pooled from two independent experiments (B, D, and E). *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparisons test (D) or one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple-comparisons test (B and E).
Techniques Used: Western Blot, Control, Transfection, Quantitative RT-PCR, Expressing, Flow Cytometry


